Archaeology
β Evidence at a glance
- π΄ Unsubstantiated2
- βͺ Insufficient data2
Latest
Top investigations
- π·πΊ Archaeology Β· Oct 5, 2026Ancient Chinese tomb minerals: what the Wushi assemblage really shows
- πΊπΈ Archaeology Β· Oct 4, 2026Tang Dynasty Tomb Murals: What a Blond Foreigner Really Shows
- π«π· Archaeology Β· Oct 3, 2026Andes Geoglyph: What the satellite images of the stone structures really show
π World pulse
- π«π· France7 stories
- πΊπΈ United States4 stories
- π¬π· Greece4 stories
- π·πΊ Russia2 stories
- π¬π§ United Kingdom1 stories
- πΉπΌ Taiwan1 stories
How we rate evidence
Evidence
- Evidence π’ DocumentedVerified primary source, two or more independent corroborations, and instrument data or a peer-reviewed/official record.
- Evidence π΅ SupportedVerified primary source and at least one independent corroboration.
- Evidence π DisputedCredible sources contradict each other.
- Evidence π΄ UnsubstantiatedNo traceable or verifiable primary source.
- Evidence βͺ Insufficient dataNot enough verified material yet β a normal, honest state.
Explanation
- Explanation ExplainedOne explanation is accepted.
- Explanation Partially explainedOne explanation leads, but is not settled.
- Explanation UnexplainedA documented observation with no leading explanation after several were tested.
- Explanation Not enough data yetWe do not know yet β and say so.
Bylines
Bylines marked "AENIGMA Editorial" are editorial pen names of the AENIGMA newsroom. Texts are written or adapted with AI assistance and reviewed by the editor before publication; the evidence label always comes from the sources, never from the byline.